Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:dateCreated
1991-7-29
pubmed:abstractText
Safety of teicoplanin has been assessed in 3377 patients treated in Europe up to the end of June 1990. One or more adverse events were experienced by 10% of patients. Age and teicoplanin dose had no significant effect on the incidence or type of adverse event. In comparative trials the incidence and profile of adverse events to teicoplanin have been similar to those seen with beta-lactam therapy. Impaired renal function occurred consistently more frequently with vancomycin therapy than with teicoplanin therapy, particularly when these drugs were co-administered with aminoglycosides. Severe skin reactions have not been reported with teicoplanin, which, unlike vancomycin, does not cause infusion rate-related release of histamine. These data provide further evidence that teicoplanin is safer than vancomycin and does not have dose-related adverse effects in the dose range 3-10 mg/kg.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
0305-7453
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
27 Suppl B
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
69-73
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1991
pubmed:articleTitle
A review of the safety profile of teicoplanin.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Review