Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/18210984
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2008-1-23
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Samia Hurst and Marion Danis provide a thoughtful framework for how to judge the morality of bedside rationing decisions. In this commentary, I applaud Hurst and Danis for advancing the level of debate about bedside rationing. But when I attempt to apply the framework to my own clinical practice, I conclude that the framework comes up short.
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
E
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Sep
|
pubmed:issn |
1054-6863
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
17
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
267-9
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:18210984-Clinical Competence,
pubmed-meshheading:18210984-Decision Making,
pubmed-meshheading:18210984-Health Care Rationing,
pubmed-meshheading:18210984-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:18210984-Physician's Practice Patterns,
pubmed-meshheading:18210984-United States,
pubmed-meshheading:18210984-United States Department of Veterans Affairs
|
pubmed:year |
2007
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Confessions of a bedside rationer: commentary on Hurst and Danis.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
The Center for Behavioral and Decesion Sciences in Medicine, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comment
|