|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
|
pubmed:issue |
2
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2008-1-15
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Previous reviews have shown inconsistent effects of publicly reported performance data on quality of care, but many new studies have become available in the 7 years since the last systematic review.
|
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:month |
Jan
|
|
pubmed:issn |
1539-3704
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
|
pubmed:day |
15
|
|
pubmed:volume |
148
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
111-23
|
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2008-6-16
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
|
|
pubmed:year |
2008
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
RAND, Santa Monica, California 90407-2138, USA.
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Review,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|
