rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0001554,
umls-concept:C0007874,
umls-concept:C0009247,
umls-concept:C0043210,
umls-concept:C0205485,
umls-concept:C0439230,
umls-concept:C0700124,
umls-concept:C1273870,
umls-concept:C1274040,
umls-concept:C1292825,
umls-concept:C1512888,
umls-concept:C1707391,
umls-concept:C1707455
|
pubmed:issue |
5
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2007-11-5
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The objective of the study was to compare pregnancy outcomes in selected women with a dilated cervix who underwent expectant management or physical examination-indicated cerclage.
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Nov
|
pubmed:issn |
1097-6868
|
pubmed:author |
pubmed-author:AiroldiJimJ,
pubmed-author:BerghellaVincenzoV,
pubmed-author:ChaithongwongwatthanaSurasithS,
pubmed-author:CotterAmandaA,
pubmed-author:DalySeanS,
pubmed-author:GómezRicardoR,
pubmed-author:MittalSuneetaS,
pubmed-author:PereiraLeonardoL,
pubmed-author:PrasertcharoensukWitoonW,
pubmed-author:RasanenJuhaJ,
pubmed-author:TolosaJorge EJE
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
197
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
483.e1-8
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:17980182-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:17980182-Cerclage, Cervical,
pubmed-meshheading:17980182-Cohort Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:17980182-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:17980182-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:17980182-Labor Stage, First,
pubmed-meshheading:17980182-Logistic Models,
pubmed-meshheading:17980182-Pregnancy,
pubmed-meshheading:17980182-Pregnancy Outcome,
pubmed-meshheading:17980182-Pregnancy Trimester, Second
|
pubmed:year |
2007
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Expectant management compared with physical examination-indicated cerclage (EM-PEC) in selected women with a dilated cervix at 14(0/7)-25(6/7) weeks: results from the EM-PEC international cohort study.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, and the Global Network for Perinatal and Reproductive Health, Portland, OR, USA.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't,
Multicenter Study
|