Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
2007-10-16
pubmed:abstractText
Previous studies reported differences in clinical treatments provided to ethnic minority children and white children. We examined whether there were differences in clinical treatments provided to Aboriginal and White infants in Canadian Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU) and whether these potential differences could be explained by differences in population characteristics, community size, maternal neighbourhood income and hospital treatment policies. The study population included 10 166 infants (n = 784 Aboriginal and n = 9382 white) admitted to 17 NICUs from all geographical regions of Canada participating in the Canadian Neonatal Network during January 1996-October 1997. We used logistic regression analyses to examine the association between ethnicity and each of seven clinical practices (surfactant treatment, antenatal steroids, blood transfusions, surgery, assisted ventilation, incubator use and transparental nutrition), after adjustment for potential confounders. We repeated theses analyses restricted to infants born <32 weeks gestation. In crude analyses, in the full sample, Aboriginal infants were less likely than white infants to receive surfactants, antenatal steroids, surgery, assisted ventilation, incubator and transparental nutrition. Among infants born <32 weeks gestation, Aboriginal infants were less likely than white infants to receive antenatal steroids, assisted ventilation, incubator and transparental nutrition. In both groups, adjusting for illness severity, gestational age and multiple births separately (model 2) and in combination with neighbourhood income and community size (model 3) resulted in non-significant associations between ethnicity and some of the treatments, but the addition of adjustment for the hospital variation in frequency of use of different treatments resulted in non-significant associations between ethnicity and all seven treatments. Additional studies are needed to explore the significance of hospital frequency of treatment and its relationship to ethnicity.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Nov
pubmed:issn
0269-5022
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
21
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
532-40
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-4-14
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:17937739-Adult, pubmed-meshheading:17937739-Canada, pubmed-meshheading:17937739-Cohort Studies, pubmed-meshheading:17937739-European Continental Ancestry Group, pubmed-meshheading:17937739-Female, pubmed-meshheading:17937739-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:17937739-Indians, North American, pubmed-meshheading:17937739-Infant, pubmed-meshheading:17937739-Infant, Newborn, pubmed-meshheading:17937739-Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, pubmed-meshheading:17937739-Inuits, pubmed-meshheading:17937739-Length of Stay, pubmed-meshheading:17937739-Male, pubmed-meshheading:17937739-Outcome Assessment (Health Care), pubmed-meshheading:17937739-Patient Selection, pubmed-meshheading:17937739-Pregnancy, pubmed-meshheading:17937739-Residence Characteristics, pubmed-meshheading:17937739-Socioeconomic Factors
pubmed:year
2007
pubmed:articleTitle
Treatment differences between Aboriginal and white infants admitted to Canadian neonatal intensive care units.
pubmed:affiliation
Center for Healthcare Innovation and Improvement, Child and Family Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada. breime@nursing.ubc.ca
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Multicenter Study