Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6 Suppl
pubmed:dateCreated
2007-11-20
pubmed:abstractText
Health information exchange (HIE) projects are sweeping the nation, with hopes that they will lead to high quality, efficient care, yet the literature on their measured benefits remains sparse. To the degree that the field adopts a common set of evaluation strategies, duplicate work can be reduced and meta-analysis will be easier. The United Hospital Fund sponsored a meeting to address HIE evaluation. HIE projects are diverse with many kinds of effects. Assessment of the operation of the HIE infrastructure and of usage should be done for all projects. The immediate business case must be demonstrated for the stakeholders. Rigorous evaluation of the effect on quality may only need to be done for a handful of projects, with simpler process studies elsewhere. Unintended consequences should be monitored. A comprehensive study of return on investment requires an assessment of all effects. Program evaluation across several projects may help set future policy.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
1532-0480
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
40
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
S3-10
pubmed:dateRevised
2011-6-13
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2007
pubmed:articleTitle
The United Hospital Fund meeting on evaluating health information exchange.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, 622 West 168th Street, VC5, New York, NY 10032, USA. hripcsak@columbia.edu
pubmed:publicationType
Congresses, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural