|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0002045,
umls-concept:C0017601,
umls-concept:C0031061,
umls-concept:C0042826,
umls-concept:C0205554,
umls-concept:C0243161,
umls-concept:C0348026,
umls-concept:C0679199,
umls-concept:C1442989,
umls-concept:C1514863,
umls-concept:C1704675,
umls-concept:C1710263,
umls-concept:C2349179,
umls-concept:C2603343
|
|
pubmed:issue |
6
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2007-11-26
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
To compare the interthreshold and intrathreshold strategy agreement of visual field end point criteria for standard automated perimetry (SAP) with the full-threshold (FT) algorithm and the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm (SITA).
|
|
pubmed:grant |
|
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17919445-10321527,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17919445-10326953,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17919445-10708227,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17919445-10889102,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17919445-12045043,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17919445-12140023,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17919445-843571,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17919445-9374242,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17919445-9656685,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17919445-9686835,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17919445-9716329
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:month |
Dec
|
|
pubmed:issn |
0002-9394
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
|
pubmed:volume |
144
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
908-913
|
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2011-9-26
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:17919445-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:17919445-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:17919445-Aged, 80 and over,
pubmed-meshheading:17919445-Algorithms,
pubmed-meshheading:17919445-Cohort Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:17919445-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:17919445-Glaucoma, Open-Angle,
pubmed-meshheading:17919445-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:17919445-Intraocular Pressure,
pubmed-meshheading:17919445-Longitudinal Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:17919445-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:17919445-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:17919445-Optic Nerve Diseases,
pubmed-meshheading:17919445-Prospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:17919445-Reproducibility of Results,
pubmed-meshheading:17919445-Sensory Thresholds,
pubmed-meshheading:17919445-Tonometry, Ocular,
pubmed-meshheading:17919445-Vision Disorders,
pubmed-meshheading:17919445-Visual Field Tests,
pubmed-meshheading:17919445-Visual Fields
|
|
pubmed:year |
2007
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Reproducibility of visual field end point criteria for standard automated perimetry, full-threshold, and Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm strategies: diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Hamilton Glaucoma Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't,
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
|
