|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
|
pubmed:issue |
6
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2009-1-14
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The purpose of this study was to compare the range of motion after standard version posterior stabilised TKR and high-flexion version TKR in patients receiving bilateral total knee replacement. Thirty-five patients were recruited. The range of motion of the knees was measured clinically with a goniometer in both the pre-operative period and the most recent follow-up. It was found that the pre-operative range of motion was comparable in the two groups. The average post-operative flexion was 105 degrees +/- 13 degrees in the standard version group and 106 degrees +/- 14 degrees in the high-flexion design group (p = 0.201, paired t-test; beta error = 0.073). A slight loss in flexion was observed in the standard version group (0.5 degrees ) as opposed to a slight gain in the high-flexion design group (2 degrees ). However, this was not statistically significant (p = 0.251, paired t-test; beta error = 0.105).
|
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17891397-11097454,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17891397-12493934,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17891397-12851353,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17891397-15292421,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17891397-15598454,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17891397-15995113,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17891397-16167157,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17891397-16310007,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17891397-16828289,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17891397-17072657,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17891397-17400089,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17891397-509811
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:month |
Dec
|
|
pubmed:issn |
0341-2695
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
|
pubmed:volume |
32
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
795-8
|
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2010-9-14
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:17891397-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:17891397-Aged, 80 and over,
pubmed-meshheading:17891397-Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee,
pubmed-meshheading:17891397-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:17891397-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:17891397-Knee Prosthesis,
pubmed-meshheading:17891397-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:17891397-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:17891397-Range of Motion, Articular,
pubmed-meshheading:17891397-Recovery of Function
|
|
pubmed:year |
2008
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Comparison of range of motion after standard and high-flexion posterior stabilised total knee replacement.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, No. 102, Pokfulam Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong. charlesnfy@netvigator.com
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|
