| pubmed-article:17886161 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0023185 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0034746 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1519249 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0031082 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1283195 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C2698651 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0332120 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:issue | 2 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2008-5-5 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:abstractText | We propose a new version of the serial reaction time (SRT) task in which participants merely looked at the target instead of responding manually. As response locations were identical to target locations, stimulus-response compatibility was maximal in this task. We demonstrated that saccadic response times decreased during training and increased again when a new sequence was presented. It is unlikely that this effect was caused by stimulus-response (S-R) learning because bonds between (visual) stimuli and (oculomotor) responses were already well established before the experiment started. Thus, the finding shows that the building of S-R bonds is not essential for learning in the SRT task. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:month | Feb | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:issn | 1747-0218 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:KlieglReinhol... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:KinderAnnette... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:RolfsMartinM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:volume | 61 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:pagination | 203-9 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2011-10-19 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17886161... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17886161... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17886161... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17886161... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17886161... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17886161... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17886161... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17886161... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17886161... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17886161... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:year | 2008 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:articleTitle | Sequence learning at optimal stimulus-response mapping: evidence from a serial reaction time task. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany. kinder@rz.uni-potsdam.de | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17886161 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
