Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
11
pubmed:dateCreated
2007-11-21
pubmed:abstractText
Randomized clinical trials have clearly shown that early reperfusion of coronary arteries is the established treatment of myocardial infarction preserving left ventricular function and reducing mortality. However, late patency of the infarct-related artery is an independent predictor of survival leading to the late open-artery hypothesis. This concept implies restoration of antegrade blood flow of the infarct-related artery in patients with myocardial infarction to improve survival by mechanisms less time-dependent or even time-independent. Possible explanations for this benefit include improved left ventricular function and electrical stability by perfusion of hibernating myocardium, accelerated infarct healing and limitation of ventricular remodeling. This review focuses on the evidence of late recanalization of occluded infarct-related arteries in patients with coronary artery disease.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Nov
pubmed:issn
0160-9289
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
30
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
541-5
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2007
pubmed:articleTitle
The late open infarct-related artery hypothesis: evidence-based medicine or not?
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Cardiology, Hospital of Wetzlar, Wetzlar, Geramny. Martin.Brueck@hkw.med.uni-giessen.de
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review