Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
10
pubmed:dateCreated
2007-9-10
pubmed:abstractText
The advent of public reporting of hospital-acquired infection rates has sparked ongoing discussion about the most appropriate surveillance data to present. When we used different numerators to calculate rates of surgical site infection following coronary artery bypass graft surgery, we found that some hospitals' rates and their rankings were notably affected.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
0899-823X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
28
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1210-2
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2007
pubmed:articleTitle
Interhospital comparisons of coronary artery bypass graft surgical site infection rates differ if donor sites are excluded.
pubmed:affiliation
Victorian Hospital Acquired Infection Surveillance System Coordinating Centre, Melbourne, Australia. philip.russo@mh.org.au
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't