Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
12
pubmed:dateCreated
1992-3-12
pubmed:abstractText
We have compared the efficacy of a once daily 360 mg sustained release preparation of verapamil (SRV) with that of once daily 100 mg atenolol in exercise-induced angina. The study was randomized, double-blind and cross-over in design involving 30 patients with chronic stable angina. A 2-week run-in placebo phase was followed by two 4-week periods of active treatment. Patients underwent exercise stress tests at 6 and 24 h post-dose at the end of each treatment phase. After the placebo phase, patients had significantly increased times to both 1 mm ST depression and angina at 6 h (afternoon stress test) compared to 24 h post-dose (morning test). The two treatments were found to be equivalent in terms of several indices of anti-anginal efficacy. The only significant differences between treatments were in relation to indices of heart rate, which were consistently lower with atenolol than with SRV. We conclude that once daily sustained release verapamil 360 mg has equivalent anti-anginal efficacy to once daily atenolol 100 mg. A lower angina threshold seems to occur in the morning in patients with ischaemic heart disease suggesting a diurnal variation.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
0195-668X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
12
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1273-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1991
pubmed:articleTitle
A comparison of sustained release verapamil versus atenolol for 24 h protection from exercise-induced angina pectoris.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Cardiology, George Eliot Hospital, Nuneaton, Warwickshire, U.K.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't