Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
Pt 3
pubmed:dateCreated
2007-8-16
pubmed:abstractText
To develop a brief measure of the therapy process and use it to examine which therapeutic ingredients were associated with outcome in a sample of patients from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) versus counselling for patients with chronic fatigue in primary care. It was hypothesized that the two therapies would be clearly distinguishable and that in terms of process variables, the therapeutic alliance would be important in predicting outcome.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0144-6657
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
46
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
253-72
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:17697477-Adolescent, pubmed-meshheading:17697477-Adult, pubmed-meshheading:17697477-Aged, pubmed-meshheading:17697477-Cognitive Therapy, pubmed-meshheading:17697477-Counseling, pubmed-meshheading:17697477-England, pubmed-meshheading:17697477-Family Practice, pubmed-meshheading:17697477-Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, pubmed-meshheading:17697477-Female, pubmed-meshheading:17697477-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:17697477-Linear Models, pubmed-meshheading:17697477-Male, pubmed-meshheading:17697477-Middle Aged, pubmed-meshheading:17697477-Multivariate Analysis, pubmed-meshheading:17697477-Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care), pubmed-meshheading:17697477-Principal Component Analysis, pubmed-meshheading:17697477-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, pubmed-meshheading:17697477-Reproducibility of Results
pubmed:year
2007
pubmed:articleTitle
Investigating the active ingredients of cognitive behaviour therapy and counselling for patients with chronic fatigue in primary care: developing a new process measure to assess treatment fidelity and predict outcome.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, UK. emma.l.godfrey@kcl.ac.uk
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't