Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
2007-8-16
pubmed:abstractText
In this article, the first explicit, theory-based comparison of 2-choice and go/no-go variants of 3 experimental tasks is presented. Prior research has questioned whether the underlying core-information processing is different for the 2 variants of a task or whether they differ mostly in response demands. The authors examined 4 different diffusion models for the go/no-go variant of each task along with a standard diffusion model for the 2-choice variant (R. Ratcliff, 1978). The 2-choice and the go/no-go models were fit to data from 4 lexical decision experiments, 1 numerosity discrimination experiment, and 1 recognition memory experiment, each with 2-choice and go/no-go variants. The models that assumed an implicit decision criterion for no-go responses produced better fits than models that did not. The best model was one in which only response criteria and the nondecisional components of processing changed between the 2 variants, supporting the view that the core information on which decisions are based is not different between them.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:commentsCorrections
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-10100390, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-10378014, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-10550497, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-10696609, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-10696612, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-11169874, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-11170305, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-11287490, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-11381834, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-11405319, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-1149469, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-12120790, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-12412886, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-12713243, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-12812276, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-13707272, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-14518805, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-14693011, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-14756592, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-15065913, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-15066392, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-15222821, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-15260205, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-1594433, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-16890214, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-2215875, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-3375400, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-3401696, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-3991839, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-451109, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-5811531, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-6184120, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-7530187, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-7651811, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-8036100, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-8127474, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-8356185, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-8409857, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-8759046, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-9706712, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17696690-9736670
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Aug
pubmed:issn
0096-3445
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
136
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
389-413
pubmed:dateRevised
2011-9-26
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2007
pubmed:articleTitle
A model of the go/no-go task.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, IL 60614, US. pgomez1@depaul.edu
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural