|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0025663,
umls-concept:C0150098,
umls-concept:C0205199,
umls-concept:C0439851,
umls-concept:C0449416,
umls-concept:C0521009,
umls-concept:C0546881,
umls-concept:C1524063,
umls-concept:C1552596,
umls-concept:C1707455,
umls-concept:C1947931
|
|
pubmed:issue |
2
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2007-7-25
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Four bacterial source tracking (BST) methods, enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequence polymerase chain reaction (ERIC-PCR), automated ribotyping using HindIII, Kirby-Bauer antibiotic resistance analysis (KB-ARA) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were directly compared using the same collection of Escherichia coli isolates. The data sets from each BST method and from composite methods were compared for library accuracy and their ability to identify water isolates.
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
|
pubmed:chemical |
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:month |
Aug
|
|
pubmed:issn |
1364-5072
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
|
pubmed:volume |
103
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
350-64
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:17650195-Animals,
pubmed-meshheading:17650195-Anti-Bacterial Agents,
pubmed-meshheading:17650195-Bacterial Typing Techniques,
pubmed-meshheading:17650195-Cattle,
pubmed-meshheading:17650195-DNA, Intergenic,
pubmed-meshheading:17650195-Drug Resistance, Bacterial,
pubmed-meshheading:17650195-Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field,
pubmed-meshheading:17650195-Escherichia coli,
pubmed-meshheading:17650195-Feces,
pubmed-meshheading:17650195-Fresh Water,
pubmed-meshheading:17650195-Polymerase Chain Reaction,
pubmed-meshheading:17650195-Quality Control,
pubmed-meshheading:17650195-Ribotyping,
pubmed-meshheading:17650195-Sewage,
pubmed-meshheading:17650195-Water Microbiology,
pubmed-meshheading:17650195-Water Pollution
|
|
pubmed:year |
2007
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Direct comparison of four bacterial source tracking methods and use of composite data sets.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University Agricultural Research Center, El Paso, TX 79927, USA.
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|
