Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
7 Suppl
pubmed:dateCreated
2007-6-28
pubmed:abstractText
The recent appreciation of widespread copy number variation in the genomes of healthy human beings has presented a significant challenge to clinical cytogeneticists who wish to use genome-wide array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) assays for clinical diagnostic purposes. Clinical cytogeneticists need to differentiate between copy number variants (CNVs) that are likely to be pathogenic and CNVs that are less likely to contribute to an affected individual's clinical presentation. Unfortunately, our knowledge of the phenotypic effects of most CNVs is minimal, leading to the classification of many CNVs as genomic imbalances of unknown clinical significance. This has caused many laboratories to resist the use of higher-resolution genome-wide array CGH assays for clinical purposes. Ironically, the accumulation and annotation of such array CGH data can lead to the rapid identification of pathogenic CNVs and the definition of new genomic syndromes that, in turn, are useful for accurate clinical genetic diagnoses.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jul
pubmed:issn
1061-4036
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
39
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
S48-54
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-11-21
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2007
pubmed:articleTitle
Copy number variations and clinical cytogenetic diagnosis of constitutional disorders.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. clee@rics.bwh.harvard.edu
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review