Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
8
pubmed:dateCreated
2007-7-30
pubmed:abstractText
Periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with well-fixed total hip or total knee prostheses present a challenging management problem as these injuries typically occur in osteoporotic bone. Conventional management entails extensive periosteal stripping to allow for plate fixation. We reviewed a consecutive series of patients who sustained fractures associated with a well fixed total knee prosthesis, a total hip prosthesis, or both. Twenty four patients with a mean age of 69.4 years were included. All patients underwent fixation via percutaneous insertion techniques with a first generation locking plate and screws (LISS--Less Invasive Skeletal Stabilization, Synthes, Paoli, PA). Three patients sustained fractures distal to a well-fixed total hip prosthesis, eighteen fractures occurred above a well-fixed total knee femoral component, and three were interprosthetic. The mean length of time from the index procedure to fracture was 76 months, range (2-172 months). Blood loss was minimal in each case, with a mean operative time of 90 min (range 60-120 min). Twenty one of twenty four went on to unite at a mean 6.2 months (range 3-19 months). Three patients underwent further surgery. One failure of fixation was encountered. Percutaneous fixation is technically demanding as it requires stable fixation without direct visualisation of the fracture site or the entire fixation device. Our results suggest percutaneous fixation with the LISS plate is an effective although technically demanding method of treatment. Complication rates were comparable to existing reports of this treatment method, and appear to be improved over traditional methods of fixation.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Aug
pubmed:issn
0020-1383
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
38
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
965-72
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:17561020-Adult, pubmed-meshheading:17561020-Aged, pubmed-meshheading:17561020-Aged, 80 and over, pubmed-meshheading:17561020-Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, pubmed-meshheading:17561020-Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, pubmed-meshheading:17561020-Bone Plates, pubmed-meshheading:17561020-Female, pubmed-meshheading:17561020-Femoral Fractures, pubmed-meshheading:17561020-Follow-Up Studies, pubmed-meshheading:17561020-Fracture Fixation, Internal, pubmed-meshheading:17561020-Fracture Healing, pubmed-meshheading:17561020-Hip Prosthesis, pubmed-meshheading:17561020-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:17561020-Knee Prosthesis, pubmed-meshheading:17561020-Male, pubmed-meshheading:17561020-Middle Aged, pubmed-meshheading:17561020-Prosthesis Failure, pubmed-meshheading:17561020-Reoperation, pubmed-meshheading:17561020-Retrospective Studies, pubmed-meshheading:17561020-Treatment Outcome
pubmed:year
2007
pubmed:articleTitle
Management of periprosthetic femur fractures with a first generation locking plate.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Joint Diseases, 301 E. 17th St., New York, NY 10003, USA. eric.fulkerson@med.nyu.edu
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article