Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
2007-5-25
pubmed:abstractText
Mechanical ventilation practice has changed over the past few decades, with tidal volumes (VT) decreasing significantly, especially in patients with acute lung injury (ALI). Patients without acute lung injury are still ventilated with large--and perhaps too large--VT. Studies of ventilator-associated lung injury in subjects without ALI demonstrate inconsistent results. Retrospective clinical studies, however, suggest that the use of large VT favors the development of lung injury in these patients. Side effects associated with the use of lower VT in patients with ALI seem to be minimal. Assuming that this will be the case in patients without ALI/acute respiratory distress syndrome too, the authors suggest that the use of lower VT should be considered in all mechanically ventilated patients whether they have ALI or not. Prospective studies should be performed to evaluate optimal ventilator management strategies for patients without ALI.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Jun
pubmed:issn
0003-3022
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
106
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1226-31
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-3-5
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2007
pubmed:articleTitle
What tidal volumes should be used in patients without acute lung injury?
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Intensive Care Medicine and Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, University of Amsterdam, and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. m.j.schultz@amc.uva.nl
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review