Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/17468564
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2007-4-30
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Several less invasive cardiac output monitoring techniques are now commercially available and have the potential to replace the pulmonary artery catheter under certain clinical circumstances. The aim of this review is to give a synopsis of the currently available cardiac output measurement methods. This information should help in selecting the appropriate technique in a particular clinical setting.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jun
|
pubmed:issn |
1531-7072
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
13
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
308-17
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:17468564-Cardiac Output,
pubmed-meshheading:17468564-Catheterization,
pubmed-meshheading:17468564-Echocardiography, Doppler,
pubmed-meshheading:17468564-Electric Impedance,
pubmed-meshheading:17468564-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:17468564-Monitoring, Physiologic,
pubmed-meshheading:17468564-Pulmonary Artery,
pubmed-meshheading:17468564-Thermodilution
|
pubmed:year |
2007
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
What technique should I use to measure cardiac output?
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Institute of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Triemli City Hospital, Switzerland. christoph.hofer@triemli.stzh.ch
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Review
|