|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
|
pubmed:issue |
1
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2007-7-6
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
To compare the efficacy of conventional pulsed coagulation (CPC) and newly developed intelligent, impedance-regulated, pulsed coagulation (IPC) in the sealing of porcine renal arteries.
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:month |
Jul
|
|
pubmed:issn |
1556-5653
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
|
pubmed:volume |
88
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
206-11
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
|
|
pubmed:year |
2007
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Intelligent, impedance-regulated, pulsed coagulation in a porcine renal artery model.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. cwallwiener@gmx.net
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
In Vitro,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|
