Linked Life Data

17437878

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/17437878

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
2007-4-17
pubmed:abstractText
A novel file-removal system (FRS) was designed to address weak points of conventional file-removal methods. The purpose of this study was to compare file-removal time and dentin removal rates among the FRS, the Masserann kit (Micro-Mega, Besancon, France), and an ultrasonic file-removal method. Ninety extracted mandibular incisors with separated nickel titanium files were divided into 3 groups of 30 teeth each. Groups 1, 2, and 3 had file-removal attempts made by using the Masserann kit, a CPR-7 titanium ultrasonic tip (Obtura-Spartan Corp., Fenton, MO), and the FRS, respectively. Each group had three operators removing the separated files. Pre-/postoperative digital radiographs were downloaded into image analyzing software that calculated the amount of dentin removed. The FRS needed less time and had less dentin loss than the others (p<0.05). There were statistical differences between the experienced operator and less experienced operators regarding the file-removal time and the dentin removal rates (p<0.05).
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
D
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
May
pubmed:issn
0099-2399
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
33
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
585-8
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2007
pubmed:articleTitle
Evaluation of the efficiency of a new file removal system in comparison with two conventional systems.
pubmed:affiliation
Pulp Biology and Endodontics Section, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan. terauti@tk.usen.ne.jp
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Evaluation Studies