Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1992-3-10
|
pubmed:abstractText |
A retrospective analysis of 314 patients with renal cell carcinoma was done focusing mainly on imaging modalities and prognostic significance of tumor stage using both the Robson and TNM systems. Computerized tomography (CT) scan proved to be the most effective modality for staging. Overall staging accuracy was 62 and 68 percent for TNM and Robson staging, respectively, and understaging was more frequent than overstaging. The actuarial five-year survival using the Robson system was 73 percent for Stage A, 68 percent Stage B, 51 percent Stage C, and 20 percent Stage D. The main limitation of the Robson system is the heterogeneity of the Stage C group which includes patients with renal vein and those with nodal involvement with a significant difference in survival. The survival by the TNM system showed no difference in those with T1, T2, T3a and T3b disease but a significant difference in those with T3c or T4a. One hundred sixteen patients (37%) presented with metastatic disease with a median survival of seventeen months (range 2-204) for those with solitary metastasis and six months (range 1-132) for those with multiple metastases (the difference was not statistically significant). Except for anecdotal cases, nephrectomy with or without treatment of the metastases did not seem to affect survival significantly. The presence of spindle cell, alone or in association with clear or granular cell, affected the prognosis adversely. Thirty-one patients had their tumors identified incidentally. Their stage at diagnosis was earlier than the symptomatic group (Stage T1-T2: 77% vs 34%), and there was a significant difference in the disease-free survival at fifty-four months between the two groups (79% vs 57%, respectively).
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Feb
|
pubmed:issn |
0090-4295
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
39
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
122-9
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:1736503-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:1736503-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:1736503-Aged, 80 and over,
pubmed-meshheading:1736503-Carcinoma, Renal Cell,
pubmed-meshheading:1736503-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:1736503-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:1736503-Kidney Neoplasms,
pubmed-meshheading:1736503-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:1736503-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:1736503-Neoplasm Staging,
pubmed-meshheading:1736503-Nephrectomy,
pubmed-meshheading:1736503-Prognosis,
pubmed-meshheading:1736503-Retrospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:1736503-Survival Rate
|
pubmed:year |
1992
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Analysis of imaging modalities, staging systems, and prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Urology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|