pubmed-article:17352840 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0009450 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:17352840 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0026339 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:17352840 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0026336 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:17352840 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1511726 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:17352840 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0021149 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:17352840 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0936012 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:17352840 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0205257 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:17352840 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0750480 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:17352840 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C2349101 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:issue | 1 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2007-12-19 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:abstractText | Capture-recapture analysis has been used to evaluate infectious disease surveillance. Violation of the underlying assumptions can jeopardize the validity of the capture-recapture estimates and a tool is needed for cross-validation. We re-examined 19 datasets of log-linear model capture-recapture studies on infectious disease incidence using three truncated models for incomplete count data as alternative population estimators. The truncated models yield comparable estimates to independent log-linear capture-recapture models and to parsimonious log-linear models when the number of patients is limited, or the ratio between patients registered once and twice is between 0.5 and 1.5. Compared to saturated log-linear models the truncated models produce considerably lower and often more plausible estimates. We conclude that for estimating infectious disease incidence independent and parsimonious three-source log-linear capture-recapture models are preferable but truncated models can be used as a heuristic tool to identify possible failure in log-linear models, especially when saturated log-linear models are selected. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:month | Jan | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:issn | 0950-2688 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SmitFF | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:GrantA DAD | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:RichardusJ... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:StoryAA | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:van HestN A... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:volume | 136 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:pagination | 14-22 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2010-9-15 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17352840... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17352840... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17352840... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17352840... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17352840... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17352840... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17352840... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17352840... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17352840... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:year | 2008 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:articleTitle | Estimating infectious diseases incidence: validity of capture-recapture analysis and truncated models for incomplete count data. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:affiliation | Division of Infectious Disease Control, Municipal Public Health Service Rotterdam Area, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. vanhestr@ggd.rotterdam.nl | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:17352840 | pubmed:publicationType | Validation Studies | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:17352840 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:17352840 | lld:pubmed |