rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2007-12-19
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Capture-recapture analysis has been used to evaluate infectious disease surveillance. Violation of the underlying assumptions can jeopardize the validity of the capture-recapture estimates and a tool is needed for cross-validation. We re-examined 19 datasets of log-linear model capture-recapture studies on infectious disease incidence using three truncated models for incomplete count data as alternative population estimators. The truncated models yield comparable estimates to independent log-linear capture-recapture models and to parsimonious log-linear models when the number of patients is limited, or the ratio between patients registered once and twice is between 0.5 and 1.5. Compared to saturated log-linear models the truncated models produce considerably lower and often more plausible estimates. We conclude that for estimating infectious disease incidence independent and parsimonious three-source log-linear capture-recapture models are preferable but truncated models can be used as a heuristic tool to identify possible failure in log-linear models, especially when saturated log-linear models are selected.
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-10513752,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-10728542,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-10752702,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-11052556,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-11171841,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-11590637,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-11745839,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-11821345,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-12403113,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-14872461,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-15586838,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-15678786,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-16602406,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-16685583,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-3427163,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-6213145,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-7485050,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-7485051,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-7485052,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-7721537,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-7888444,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-8654510,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-8671546,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/17352840-9463850
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jan
|
pubmed:issn |
0950-2688
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
136
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
14-22
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2010-9-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
|
pubmed:year |
2008
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Estimating infectious diseases incidence: validity of capture-recapture analysis and truncated models for incomplete count data.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Division of Infectious Disease Control, Municipal Public Health Service Rotterdam Area, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. vanhestr@ggd.rotterdam.nl
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Validation Studies
|