Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/17230234
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2007-2-15
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The purpose of the study is to compare surrogate estimates of insulin sensitivity with a directly measured insulin sensitivity index, steady-state plasma glucose (SSPG) from insulin suppression test (IST), in subjects with hypertension. Two hundred and twenty-eight hypertensive patients who received IST for SSPG were included for analysis. Estimates from fasting measurements alone, homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI)), and indices from fasting and/or 2 h samples (ISI(0,120) and ISI(TX)) were calculated. In addition to Pearson and partial correlations, variance-component models were used to test the relationship between surrogate estimates of insulin sensitivity and SSPG. A large proportion of variance owing to covariates in the variance-component models indicated the goodness of model fit, irrespective of the independence among variables. SSPG was positively correlated with logarithmic transformation (Log) (HOMA-IR) and negatively correlated with QUICKI, Log (ISI(0,120)) and ISI(TX) (all P<0.0001). Log (ISI(0,120)) seemed to have a better correlation with SSPG (r=-0.72) than other measures in partial correlation. The proportion of variance owing to all covariates of Log (ISI(0,120)) and ISI(TX) were larger than those of Log (HOMA-IR) and QUICKI in the variance-component models. After adjustments for demographic and obesity covariates, the proportion of variance explained by Log (ISI(0,120)) were largest among the surrogate measures in the variance-component models. Our results showed that ISI(0,120) and ISI(TX) correlated better with SSPG than those used fasting measures alone (HOMA-IR and QUICKI). Log (ISI(0,120)) currently showing the strongest association with SSPG than other estimates is adaptable for use in large studies of hypertension.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Mar
|
pubmed:issn |
0950-9240
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
21
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
246-52
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2011-11-17
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:17230234-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:17230234-Analysis of Variance,
pubmed-meshheading:17230234-Asian Continental Ancestry Group,
pubmed-meshheading:17230234-Blood Glucose,
pubmed-meshheading:17230234-Diabetes Mellitus,
pubmed-meshheading:17230234-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:17230234-Glucose Clamp Technique,
pubmed-meshheading:17230234-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:17230234-Hypertension,
pubmed-meshheading:17230234-Insulin,
pubmed-meshheading:17230234-Insulin Resistance,
pubmed-meshheading:17230234-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:17230234-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:17230234-Predictive Value of Tests,
pubmed-meshheading:17230234-Sensitivity and Specificity
|
pubmed:year |
2007
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Surrogate estimates of insulin sensitivity in subjects with hypertension.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Medicine, Section of General Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. chhwu@vghtpe.gov.tw
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't,
Multicenter Study
|