Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/17216552
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
10
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2007-10-30
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The objective of the study was to compare preoperative and postoperative sexual function between women undergoing rectocele repair with porcine dermis graft and women undergoing site-specific repair of rectovaginal fascia. A standardized, validated questionnaire (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire [PISQ]) was used to collect preoperative sexual function data from 100 patients with rectocele pelvic organ prolapse quantification stage 2 or greater. Fifty women underwent rectocele repair utilizing porcine dermis graft (group 1) and 50 women underwent a site-specific repair of the rectovaginal fascia (group 2). The same questionnaire was administered to all subjects 6 months after surgery. The two groups were similar in age, race, parity, prior hysterectomy, and postmenopausal hormone use. Preoperative sexual function scores were similar in the two groups (group 1 81.4+/-7.3 and group 2: 83.6+/-8.2, p=1.0). Six months after surgery, PISQ scores in group 1 significantly increased (score increase 19.9+/-2.2, p=0.01). The mean increase in PISQ scores for group 2 was 6.9+/-3.1 (p=0.08). When compared with group 2, subjects undergoing rectocele repair with porcine dermis graft scored significantly higher on the PISQ 6 months after surgery (group 1 101.3+/-6.4 and group 2 89.7+/-7.1, p=0.01). We conclude that rectocele repair using porcine dermis graft is associated with improved sexual functioning when compared with site-specific rectovaginal fascia repair.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Oct
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:volume |
18
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
1163-9
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2011-8-18
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:17216552-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:17216552-Bioprosthesis,
pubmed-meshheading:17216552-Coitus,
pubmed-meshheading:17216552-Fascia,
pubmed-meshheading:17216552-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:17216552-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:17216552-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:17216552-Questionnaires,
pubmed-meshheading:17216552-Recovery of Function,
pubmed-meshheading:17216552-Rectocele,
pubmed-meshheading:17216552-Transplantation, Autologous
|
pubmed:year |
2007
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Sexual function in women after rectocele repair with acellular porcine dermis graft vs site-specific rectovaginal fascia repair.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Riverside Methodist Hospital, Suite 501, North Medical Building, 3545 Olentangy River Road, Columbus, OH, and University of Iowa, USA. jnovi@ohiohealth.com
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|