Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/17184760
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
8
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2007-7-3
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Accurate modelling of time-to-event data is of particular importance for both exploratory and predictive analysis in cancer, and can have a direct impact on clinical care. This study presents a detailed double-blind evaluation of the accuracy in out-of-sample prediction of mortality from two generic non-linear models, using artificial neural networks benchmarked against a partial logistic spline, log-normal and COX regression models. A data set containing 2880 samples was shared over the Internet using a purpose-built secure environment called GEOCONDA (www.geoconda.com). The evaluation was carried out in three parts. The first was a comparison between the predicted survival estimates for each of the four survival groups defined by the TNM staging system, against the empirical estimates derived by the Kaplan-Meier method. The second approach focused on the accurate prediction of survival over time, quantified with the time dependent C index (C(td)). Finally, calibration plots were obtained over the range of follow-up and tested using a generalization of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. All models showed satisfactory performance, with values of C(td) of about 0.7. None of the models showed a systematic tendency towards over/under estimation of the observed survival at tau=3 and 5 years. At tau=10 years, all models underestimated the observed survival, except for COX regression which returned an overestimate. The study presents a robust and unbiased benchmarking methodology using a bespoke web facility. It was concluded that powerful, recent flexible modelling algorithms show a comparative predictive performance to that of more established methods from the medical and biological literature, for the reference data set.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Aug
|
pubmed:issn |
0010-4825
|
pubmed:author |
pubmed-author:AntoliniLL,
pubmed-author:AungMM,
pubmed-author:BiganzoliEE,
pubmed-author:BoracchiPP,
pubmed-author:CampbellII,
pubmed-author:DamatoBB,
pubmed-author:IfeachorEE,
pubmed-author:LamiVV,
pubmed-author:LisboaPP,
pubmed-author:SetzkornCC,
pubmed-author:StalbovskayaVV,
pubmed-author:TaktakAA
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
37
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
1108-20
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2010-11-18
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:17184760-Benchmarking,
pubmed-meshheading:17184760-Computer Simulation,
pubmed-meshheading:17184760-Databases, Factual,
pubmed-meshheading:17184760-Double-Blind Method,
pubmed-meshheading:17184760-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:17184760-Great Britain,
pubmed-meshheading:17184760-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:17184760-Kaplan-Meier Estimate,
pubmed-meshheading:17184760-Linear Models,
pubmed-meshheading:17184760-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:17184760-Melanoma,
pubmed-meshheading:17184760-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:17184760-Neural Networks (Computer),
pubmed-meshheading:17184760-Nonlinear Dynamics,
pubmed-meshheading:17184760-Proportional Hazards Models,
pubmed-meshheading:17184760-Survival Analysis,
pubmed-meshheading:17184760-Uveal Neoplasms
|
pubmed:year |
2007
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Double-blind evaluation and benchmarking of survival models in a multi-centre study.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Clinical Engineering, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK. afgt@liv.ac.uk
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't,
Multicenter Study,
Evaluation Studies
|