Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/17177903
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
5
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2006-12-20
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The objective of this study was to determine the significance of in-hospital rehabilitation facility vs. distant rehabilitation facilities in the outcomes and complications of post-operative head and neck surgical patients. Retrospective review of head and neck surgical patients was conducted over a 5-year period at a tertiary care medical centre. Fifty patients met criteria for this study (35 males, 15 females). Forty-two patients had a primary squamous cell carcinoma and eight patients had other primary malignancies of the head and neck. Thirty-two patients were placed in an in-hospital rehabilitation facility and 18 patients were placed in distant rehabilitation facilities (average distance 40.9 miles). Seventeen patients (34%) had complications including infection/drainage (seven patients), fistula (six patients), pneumonia (two patients), wound dehiscence (two patients) and other minor complications. The difference complication rate among the two groups was not statistically significant (37.5% in-hospital rehabilitation, 27.8% distant rehabilitation; P=0.496). The rate of hospital re-admission was not statistically significant (25% in-hospital rehabilitation patients, 16.7% distant rehabilitation patients; P=0.505). The average length of stay of patients without complications was 18.5 days (SD=5.8) for in-hospital rehabilitation and 12.9 days (SD=17) for distant rehabilitation. This difference was not statistically significant (P=0.346). In summary, one-third of post-operative head and neck surgical patients developed complications while in a rehabilitation facility. The length of stay, hospital re-admission rate and frequency of complications does not correlate with the proximity of the rehabilitation facility to the hospital where the patients received their surgery.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
N
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Dec
|
pubmed:issn |
0961-5423
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
15
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
458-62
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:17177903-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:17177903-Aged, 80 and over,
pubmed-meshheading:17177903-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:17177903-Head and Neck Neoplasms,
pubmed-meshheading:17177903-Health Services Accessibility,
pubmed-meshheading:17177903-Hospitalization,
pubmed-meshheading:17177903-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:17177903-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:17177903-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:17177903-Residence Characteristics,
pubmed-meshheading:17177903-Retrospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:17177903-Travel,
pubmed-meshheading:17177903-Treatment Outcome
|
pubmed:year |
2006
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Effect of rehabilitation facility location on outcomes in head and neck surgical patients.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. nitin.bhatia@tufts.edu
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Evaluation Studies
|