|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
|
pubmed:issue |
6
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2007-5-18
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
To assess the consistency of inclusion and grading of major drug interactions for 50 drugs in four leading international drug interaction compendia. METHODS Four international drug interaction compendia were compared: the drug interactions appendix of the British National Formulary, the interaction supplement in the French drug compendium Vidal, and two US drug interaction compendia, Drug Interaction Facts and the Micromedex (Drug-Reax) program. Major interactions were defined as potentially hazardous in BNF or with the warning 'contraindication' or 'avoid' in Vidal or with the significance grading 1 or 2 in DIF. Major interactions for a list of 50 drugs were searched in all four compendia.
|
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
|
pubmed:chemical |
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:month |
Jun
|
|
pubmed:issn |
0306-5251
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
|
pubmed:volume |
63
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
709-14
|
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2009-11-18
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
|
|
pubmed:year |
2007
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Comparative assessment of four drug interaction compendia.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Sansom Institute, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia. agnes.vitry@unisa.edu.au
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|
