Linked Life Data

17125150

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/17125150

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
2006-12-4
pubmed:abstractText
We identified 1113 articles (103 reviews, 1010 primary research articles) published in 2005 that describe experiments performed using commercially available optical biosensors. While this number of publications is impressive, we find that the quality of the biosensor work in these articles is often pretty poor. It is a little disappointing that there appears to be only a small set of researchers who know how to properly perform, analyze, and present biosensor data. To help focus the field, we spotlight work published by 10 research groups that exemplify the quality of data one should expect to see from a biosensor experiment. Also, in an effort to raise awareness of the common problems in the biosensor field, we provide side-by-side examples of good and bad data sets from the 2005 literature.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0952-3499
pubmed:author
pubmed:copyrightInfo
Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
19
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
478-534
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-11-21
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
Survey of the year 2005 commercial optical biosensor literature.
pubmed:affiliation
Center for Biomolecular Interaction Analysis, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review