Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
11
pubmed:dateCreated
2006-11-28
pubmed:abstractText
Cases first notified to a Registry and successfully followed back have an apparently worse prognosis than cases registered in life. A simple approach can be used to assess whether this is due to selection bias, incomplete follow-back or intrinsically higher mortality. For the colorectal, breast and stomach cancers studied and for comparable registries, the main explanations are likely to be selection bias and higher mortality.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
0007-0920
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
4
pubmed:volume
95
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1576-8
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-9-11
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2006
pubmed:articleTitle
Survival of death certificate initiated registrations: Selection bias, incomplete trace-back or higher mortality?
pubmed:affiliation
Trent Cancer Registry, 5 Old Fulwood Road, Sheffield S10 3TG, England. paul.silcocks@trentcancer.nhs.uk
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study