17060823

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/17060823

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0025663, umls-concept:C0242485
pubmed:issue	11 Suppl 3
pubmed:dateCreated	2006-10-24
pubmed:abstractText	There is little agreement regarding best practices for constructing and assessing the quality of crosscultural measures. This paper discusses several topics that are relevant to further progress in this area: 1) a lack of consensus regarding conceptualizations of equivalence; 2) emphasis on shared methods versus shared meaning; and 3) the application of cultural theories to measurement problems. Future progress in crosscultural measurement will benefit from continued exploration of these issues.
pubmed:language	eng
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/0230027
pubmed:citationSubset	IM
pubmed:status	MEDLINE
pubmed:month	Nov
pubmed:issn	0025-7079
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:JohnsonTimothy PTP
pubmed:issnType	Print
pubmed:volume	44
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	S17-20
pubmed:meshHeading	pubmed-meshheading:17060823-Cross-Cultural Comparison, pubmed-meshheading:17060823-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:17060823-Reference Standards, pubmed-meshheading:17060823-Research
pubmed:year	2006
pubmed:articleTitle	Methods and frameworks for crosscultural measurement.
pubmed:affiliation	Survey Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607, USA. timj@uic.edu
pubmed:publicationType	Journal Article, Review