17054246

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/17054246

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0007113, umls-concept:C0031150, umls-concept:C1273428
pubmed:issue	4
pubmed:dateCreated	2006-10-20
pubmed:abstractText	Because definitive long-term results are not yet available, the oncological safety of laparoscopic surgery for treatment of rectal cancer remains controversial. However, laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME) for rectal cancer has been proposed to have several short-term advantages in comparison with open total mesorectal excision (OTME).
pubmed:language	eng
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/100909747
pubmed:citationSubset	IM
pubmed:status	MEDLINE
pubmed:issn	1469-493X
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:BreukinkSS, pubmed-author:PierieJJ, pubmed-author:WiggersTT
pubmed:issnType	Electronic
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	CD005200
pubmed:meshHeading	pubmed-meshheading:17054246-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:17054246-Laparoscopy, pubmed-meshheading:17054246-Rectal Neoplasms, pubmed-meshheading:17054246-Rectum, pubmed-meshheading:17054246-Surgical Procedures, Elective, pubmed-meshheading:17054246-Treatment Outcome
pubmed:year	2006
pubmed:articleTitle	Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
pubmed:affiliation	Groningen University Hospital, Dept. of Surg., Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, Netherlands. s.breukink@planet.nl
pubmed:publicationType	Journal Article, Review, Meta-Analysis