Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/17032586
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
7
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2006-10-11
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Cryopreservation of spermatozoa is useful for gene banking and for in vitro fertilisation (IVF). This study compared several published cryopreservation techniques to find the most efficient for rhesus macaques. Effectiveness was assessed by sperm longevity (post-thaw motility % and duration) and ability to hyperactivate in response to chemical activators (caffeine, dibutyryl cyclic AMP). Each ejaculate from three males was treated with four published cryopreservation protocols (Seier et al. 1993; Sanchez-Partida et al. 2000; Si et al. 2000; Isachenko et al. 2005). Upon thawing, each sub-sample was incubated either at 37 degrees C in 5% CO2 in air with or without activators or at approximately 22 degrees C in atmospheric air without activators for 0-24 h. Samples cryopreserved using one method showed zero motility and were not included in the 2 ;2 G-test statistical analysis. The other methods all demonstrated good immediate post-thaw motility rates (68%, 73% and 62% respectively) and underwent capacitation after exposure to activators. Sperm motility in each treatment decreased over time at both temperatures but overall, incubation at 22 degrees C preserved motility better in all three methods. In summary, cryopreservation of rhesus spermatozoa using the method published by Sanchez-Partida et al. or Seier et al. appeared best, potentially supporting gene banking as well as allowing for multiple IVF uses from the same sample.
|
pubmed:grant |
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/grant/R03 HD046553-01A1,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/grant/R03 HD046553-02,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/grant/R03 HD046553-02S1,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/grant/R03 HD046553-03,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/grant/R21 RR021881-01,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/grant/R21 RR021881-02,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/grant/R21 RR021881-03,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/grant/R21 RR021881-04,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/grant/RR03640,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/grant/RR15395
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
1031-3613
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
18
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
777-80
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2011-4-26
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:17032586-Animals,
pubmed-meshheading:17032586-Cryopreservation,
pubmed-meshheading:17032586-Freezing,
pubmed-meshheading:17032586-Macaca mulatta,
pubmed-meshheading:17032586-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:17032586-Semen Preservation,
pubmed-meshheading:17032586-Sperm Motility,
pubmed-meshheading:17032586-Spermatozoa
|
pubmed:year |
2006
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Comparison of protocols for cryopreservation of rhesus monkey spermatozoa by post-thaw motility recovery and hyperactivation.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Biological Sciences, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70148, USA. snichols@uno.edu
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
|