Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
2006-8-14
pubmed:abstractText
Poor reproducibility of spinal palpation has been reported in previously published literature, and authors of recent reviews have posted criticism on study quality. This article critically analyzes the literature pertaining to the inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of spinal palpation to investigate the consistency of study results and assess the level of evidence for reproducibility.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
1532-6586
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:volume
29
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
475-85, 485.e1-10
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
Manual examination of the spine: a systematic critical literature review of reproducibility.
pubmed:affiliation
Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics Research Department, Part of Clinical Locomotion Science, Odense, Denmark. m.jensen@nikkb.dk
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Meta-Analysis