Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16904495
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
6
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2006-8-14
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Poor reproducibility of spinal palpation has been reported in previously published literature, and authors of recent reviews have posted criticism on study quality. This article critically analyzes the literature pertaining to the inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of spinal palpation to investigate the consistency of study results and assess the level of evidence for reproducibility.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
1532-6586
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Electronic
|
pubmed:volume |
29
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
475-85, 485.e1-10
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:articleTitle |
Manual examination of the spine: a systematic critical literature review of reproducibility.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics Research Department, Part of Clinical Locomotion Science, Odense, Denmark. m.jensen@nikkb.dk
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Review,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't,
Meta-Analysis
|