Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
1-2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1990-4-19
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The authors performed US-guided biopsy on 30 consecutive patients with prostatic masses of an undefined nature. Two samples were taken from each patient, one using an aspirating needle and another using a cutting needle. The two techniques proved to be quite complementary, even in the light of subsequent diagnostic follow-ups. Moreover, the possibility of comparing the cytological findings with the pathologic ones, with a "double blind" technique, greatly increased bioptic reliability.
|
pubmed:language |
ita
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
0033-8362
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
79
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
83-6
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2008-10-21
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:1690439-Biopsy, Needle,
pubmed-meshheading:1690439-Cytodiagnosis,
pubmed-meshheading:1690439-Evaluation Studies as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:1690439-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:1690439-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:1690439-Prostate,
pubmed-meshheading:1690439-Prostatic Diseases,
pubmed-meshheading:1690439-Prostatic Hyperplasia,
pubmed-meshheading:1690439-Prostatic Neoplasms,
pubmed-meshheading:1690439-Ultrasonography
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
[Comparison of cytology and microhistology in ultrasonic_guided fine-needle biopsy of the prostate].
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Servizio di Radiologia, Ospedale Generale Regionale Umberto I, USL 12, Ancona.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
English Abstract
|