Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16812658
Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
3
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
2010-6-29
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Finding a theoretically sound feedback function for variable-interval schedules remains an important unsolved problem. It is important because interval schedules model a significant feature of the world: the dependence of reinforcement on factors beyond the organism's control. The problem remains unsolved because no feedback function yet proposed satisfies all the theoretical and empirical requirements. Previous suggestions that succeed in fitting data fail theoretically because they violate a newly recognized theoretical requirement: The slope of the function must approach or equal 1.0 at the origin. A function is presented that satisfies all requirements but lacks any theoretical justification. This function and two suggested by Prelec and Herrnstein (1978) and Nevin and Baum (1980) are evaluated against several sets of data. All three fitted the data well. The success of the two theoretically incorrect functions raises an empirical puzzle: Low rates of reinforcement are coupled with response rates that seem anomalously high. It remains to be discovered what this reflects about the temporal patterning of operant behavior at low reinforcement rates. A theoretically and empirically correct function derived from basic assumptions about operant behavior also remains to be discovered.
|
| pubmed:commentsCorrections |
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812658-1602267,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812658-16811278,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812658-16811392,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812658-16811627,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812658-16811687,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812658-16811928,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812658-16812114,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812658-16812130,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812658-16812187,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812658-16812255,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812658-16812540,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812658-16812541,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16812658-3279150
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:status |
PubMed-not-MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
May
|
| pubmed:issn |
0022-5002
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
57
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
365-75
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2010-9-14
|
| pubmed:year |
1992
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
In search of the feedback function for variable-interval schedules.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|