Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
2006-9-25
pubmed:abstractText
The present study concerns the problem of finding appropriate experimental conditions and comparison criteria to assess the kinetic performance of LC supports with different sizes or morphologies. A general procedure, based on evaluating each support for its own optimal mobile-phase composition, is proposed. The practical elaboration of the procedure is illustrated using the specific case of a capillary LC separation of a series of polycyclic aromatic test compounds employing silica-monolith capillary columns and capillary columns packed with 6-microm porous particles. To compare the systems for their ability to yield the fastest critical-pair separation, plate-height measurements are transformed into an effective plate number kinetic plot, i.e., a plot of the extrapolated retention time divided by the square of the extrapolated effective plate number (t(R)/N(eff)(2)) versus N(eff). This type of data representation provides a direct and universal basis to compare the kinetic performance of different LC supports and it corrects for differences in retention strength arising from different phase ratios.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
1873-3778
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Electronic
pubmed:day
13
pubmed:volume
1130
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
108-14
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2006
pubmed:articleTitle
Selection of comparison criteria and experimental conditions to evaluate the kinetic performance of monolithic and packed-bed columns.
pubmed:affiliation
Polymer-Analysis Group, Van't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't