Linked Life Data

16715957

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16715957

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
2006-5-23
pubmed:abstractText
Both reconstruction algorithms, filtered backprojection (FBP) and ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM), are widely used in clinical positron emission tomography (PET) studies. Image reconstruction for most neurotransmission PET scan data is performed by FBP, while image reconstruction for whole-body [18F]FDG scan data is usually performed by OSEM. Although several investigators have compared FBP and OSEM in terms of the quantification of regional radioactivity and physiological parameters calculated from PET data, only a few studies have compared the two reconstruction algorithms in PET studies that estimate neurotransmission, i.e., neuroreceptor and neurotransporter binding. In this study we compared mean regional radioactivity concentration in the late phase and binding potential (BP) between FBP and OSEM algorithms in neurotransmission PET studies for [11C]raclopride and [11C]DASB.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
0914-7187
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
20
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
237-43
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2006
pubmed:articleTitle
Effects of image reconstruction algorithm on neurotransmission PET studies in humans: comparison between filtered backprojection and ordered subsets expectation maximization.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Molecular Neuroimaging, Molecular Imaging Center, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, 4-9-1, Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Controlled Clinical Trial