Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16661097
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
6
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2010-6-29
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Partitioning and utilization of assimilated C and N were compared in nonnodulated, NO(3)-fed and nodulated, N(2)-fed plants of white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). The NO(3) regime used (5 millimolar NO(3)) promoted closely similar rates of growth and N assimilation as in the symbiotic plants. Over 90% of the N absorbed by the NO(3)-fed plants was judged to be reduced in roots. Empirically based models of C and N flow demonstrated that patterns of incorporation of C and N into dry matter and exchange of C and N among plant parts were essentially similar in the two forms of nutrition. NO(3)-fed and N(2)-fed plants transported similar types and proportions of organic solutes in xylem and phloem. Withdrawal of NO(3) supply from NO(3)-fed plants led to substantial changes in assimilate partitioning, particularly in increased translocation of N from shoot to root. Nodulated plants showed a lower (57%) conversion of C or net photosynthate to dry matter than did NO(3)-fed plants (69%), and their stems were only half as effective as those of NO(3)-fed plants in xylem to phloem transfer of N supplied from the root. Below-ground parts of symbiotic plants consumed a larger share (58%) of the plants' net photosynthate than did NO(3)-fed roots (50%), thus reflecting a higher CO(2) loss per unit of N assimilated (10.2 milligrams C/milligram N) by the nodulated root than by the root of the NO(3)-fed plant (8.1 milligrams C/milligram N). Theoretical considerations indicated that the greater CO(2) output of the nodulated root involved a slightly greater expenditure for N(2) than for NO(3) assimilation, a small extra cost due to growth and maintenance of nodule tissue, and a considerably greater nonassimilatory component of respiration in root tissue of the symbiotic plant than in the root of the NO(3)-fed plant.
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16661097-16659881,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16661097-16660179,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16661097-16660192,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16661097-16660802,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16661097-16660861,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16661097-16661076,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16661097-16661096,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16661097-646114
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:status |
PubMed-not-MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Dec
|
pubmed:issn |
0032-0889
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
64
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
1083-8
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2010-9-15
|
pubmed:year |
1979
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Economy of Carbon and Nitrogen in a Nodulated and Nonnodulated (NO(3)-grown) Legume.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Botany, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, 6009.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|