Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:dateCreated
2006-5-2
pubmed:abstractText
Stroke is the second to third leading cause of death and the main cause of severe, long-term disability in adults. However, treatment is almost reduced to fibrinolysis, a therapy useful in a low percentage of patients. Given that the immediate treatment for stroke is often unfeasible in the clinical setting, the need for new therapy strategies is imperative. After stroke, the remaining impairment in functions essential for routine activities, such as movement programming and execution, sensorimotor integration, language and other cognitive functions have a deep and life-long impact on the quality of life. An interesting point is that a slow but consistent recovery can be observed in the clinical practice over a period of weeks and months. Whereas the recovery in the first few days likely results from edema resolution and/or from reperfusion of the ischemic penumbra, a large part of the recovery afterwards is due mainly to brain plasticity, by which some regions of the brain assume the functions previously performed by the damaged areas. Neurogenesis and angiogenesis are other possible mechanisms of recovery after stroke. An understanding of the mechanisms underlying functional recovery may shed light on strategies for neurorepair, an alternative with a wide therapeutic window when compared with neuroprotective strategies.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
1015-9770
pubmed:author
pubmed:copyrightInfo
Copyright 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
21 Suppl 2
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
54-63
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:16651815-Animals, pubmed-meshheading:16651815-Brain, pubmed-meshheading:16651815-Cell Differentiation, pubmed-meshheading:16651815-Cell Movement, pubmed-meshheading:16651815-Cell Proliferation, pubmed-meshheading:16651815-Clinical Trials as Topic, pubmed-meshheading:16651815-Combined Modality Therapy, pubmed-meshheading:16651815-Cytidine Diphosphate Choline, pubmed-meshheading:16651815-Dopamine Agents, pubmed-meshheading:16651815-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:16651815-Neuronal Plasticity, pubmed-meshheading:16651815-Neurons, pubmed-meshheading:16651815-Neuroprotective Agents, pubmed-meshheading:16651815-Regenerative Medicine, pubmed-meshheading:16651815-Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors, pubmed-meshheading:16651815-Stem Cell Transplantation, pubmed-meshheading:16651815-Stem Cells, pubmed-meshheading:16651815-Stroke
pubmed:year
2006
pubmed:articleTitle
Neurorepair versus neuroprotection in stroke.
pubmed:affiliation
Departamento de Farmacología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study