Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
11
pubmed:dateCreated
1992-2-18
pubmed:abstractText
In 180 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent radical hepatectomy, 52 patients were received preoperative arterial chemoembolization (TAE) for the whole liver (whole-liver TAE group: group A), 39 for the limited area of the liver (lobar or segmental TAE group: group B) and the remaining 89 had no treatments before surgery (control group: group C). In order to evaluate the significance of preoperative TAE, long-term prognoses were compared among the three groups. Although there were no significant differences in survivals between A and C, the 2- and 6-year survivals in group B were significantly better than those in group C (P less than 0.05). With regard to reduction rates of tumors and necrotizing effect for daughter nodules after TAE, the lobar or segmental TAE was significantly superior to the whole-liver TAE. Moreover, the lobar or segmental TAE deteriorated the liver function significantly less than the whole-liver TAE. These findings suggest that the lobar or segmental TAE is more advantageous than the whole-liver TAE as a preoperative adjuvant therapy.
pubmed:language
jpn
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Nov
pubmed:issn
0446-6586
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
88
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
N
pubmed:pagination
2757-62
pubmed:dateRevised
2011-8-2
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1991
pubmed:articleTitle
[The assessment of preoperative transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)--the comparison between "whole-liver" TAE and "lobar or segmental" TAE].
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Surgery, Center for Adult diseases, Osaka.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, English Abstract