Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
2006-4-25
pubmed:abstractText
Adjustment Disorders With Anxiety (ADWA) account for almost 10% of psychologically motivated consultations in primary care. The aim of this double-blind randomised parallel group study was to compare (non-inferiority test) the efficacies of etifoxine, a non-benzodiazepine anxiolytic drug, and lorazepam, a benzodiazepine, for ADWA outpatients followed by general practitioners. 191 outpatients (mean age: 43, female: 66%) were assigned to receive etifoxine (50 mg tid) or lorazepam (0.5-0.5-1 mg /day) for 28 days. Efficacy was evaluated on days 7 and 28 of the treatment. The main efficacy assessment criterion was the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety score (HAM-A) on Day 28 adjusted to Day 0. The anxiolytic effect of etifoxine was found not inferior to that of lorazepam (HAM-A score decrease: 54.6% vs 52.3%, respectively, p=0.0006). The two drugs were equivalent on Day 28. However, more etifoxine recipients responded to the treatment (HAM-A score decreased by >or=50%, p=0.03). Clinical improvement (based on Clinical Global Impression scale CGI, Social Adjustment Scale Self-Report SAS-SR, and Sheehan scores) was observed in both treatment arms, but more etifoxine patients improved markedly (p=0.03) and had a marked therapeutic effect without side effects as assessed by CGI, p=0.04. Moreover, 1 week after stopping treatment, fewer patients taking etifoxine experienced a rebound of anxiety, compared to lorazepam (1 and 8, respectively, p=0.034).
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
0885-6222
pubmed:author
pubmed:copyrightInfo
Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
21
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
139-49
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-10-27
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:16625522-Adjustment Disorders, pubmed-meshheading:16625522-Adolescent, pubmed-meshheading:16625522-Adult, pubmed-meshheading:16625522-Aged, pubmed-meshheading:16625522-Anti-Anxiety Agents, pubmed-meshheading:16625522-Anxiety, pubmed-meshheading:16625522-Confidence Intervals, pubmed-meshheading:16625522-Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, pubmed-meshheading:16625522-Double-Blind Method, pubmed-meshheading:16625522-Drug Evaluation, pubmed-meshheading:16625522-Family Practice, pubmed-meshheading:16625522-Female, pubmed-meshheading:16625522-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:16625522-Lorazepam, pubmed-meshheading:16625522-Male, pubmed-meshheading:16625522-Middle Aged, pubmed-meshheading:16625522-Oxazines, pubmed-meshheading:16625522-Prospective Studies, pubmed-meshheading:16625522-Retrospective Studies, pubmed-meshheading:16625522-Severity of Illness Index, pubmed-meshheading:16625522-Time Factors
pubmed:year
2006
pubmed:articleTitle
Efficacy of etifoxine compared to lorazepam monotherapy in the treatment of patients with adjustment disorders with anxiety: a double-blind controlled study in general practice.
pubmed:affiliation
CPCET et Pharmacologie Clinique, Institut des Neurosciences Cognitives de la Méditerranée, Faculté de Médecine, UMR CNRS Université de la Méditerranée, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille-Hôpital de la Timone, 13385 Marseille Cedex 5, France.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't