Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
2006-3-20
pubmed:abstractText
We compared the outcomes of 298 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first or second complete remission (CR1 or CR2) receiving HLA-matched sibling allografts after cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation (Cy-TBI) conditioning with 204 patients receiving etoposide and TBI. Consequently, 4 groups were compared: Cy-TBI <13 Gy (n = 217), Cy-TBI > or =13 Gy (n = 81), etoposide-TBI <13 Gy (n = 53), and etoposide-TBI > or =13 Gy (n = 151). Analyses of relapse, leukemia-free survival (LFS), and survival were performed separately for CR1 and CR2 transplantations. Transplant-related mortality did not differ by conditioning regimen. In CR1, there were also no significant differences in relapse, LFS, or survival by conditioning regimen. In CR2, these outcomes differed among conditioning groups. In comparison with Cy-TBI <13 Gy, the risks of relapse, treatment failure (inverse of LFS), and mortality tended to be lower with etoposide (regardless of TBI dose) or with TBI doses > or =13 Gy. For both CR1 and CR2 transplantations, causes of death were similar among the groups; disease recurrence accounted for 47% of deaths. We conclude that for HLA-identical sibling allografts for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in CR2, there is an advantage in substituting etoposide for Cy or, when Cy is used, in increasing the TBI dose to > or =13 Gy.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
1083-8791
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
12
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
438-53
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:16545728-Adolescent, pubmed-meshheading:16545728-Adult, pubmed-meshheading:16545728-Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic, pubmed-meshheading:16545728-Child, pubmed-meshheading:16545728-Child, Preschool, pubmed-meshheading:16545728-Cyclophosphamide, pubmed-meshheading:16545728-Disease-Free Survival, pubmed-meshheading:16545728-Etoposide, pubmed-meshheading:16545728-Female, pubmed-meshheading:16545728-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, pubmed-meshheading:16545728-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:16545728-Infant, pubmed-meshheading:16545728-Male, pubmed-meshheading:16545728-Middle Aged, pubmed-meshheading:16545728-Myeloablative Agonists, pubmed-meshheading:16545728-Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma, pubmed-meshheading:16545728-Prospective Studies, pubmed-meshheading:16545728-Remission Induction, pubmed-meshheading:16545728-Siblings, pubmed-meshheading:16545728-Survival Rate, pubmed-meshheading:16545728-Transplantation, Homologous, pubmed-meshheading:16545728-Transplantation Conditioning, pubmed-meshheading:16545728-Whole-Body Irradiation
pubmed:year
2006
pubmed:articleTitle
A comparison of cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation with etoposide and total body irradiation as conditioning regimens for patients undergoing sibling allografting for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first or second complete remission.
pubmed:affiliation
Adult BMT Unit, Bristol Children's Hospital, Bristol, UK.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Multicenter Study, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural