|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
|
pubmed:issue |
3
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2006-3-13
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Controversy persists regarding the optimal management of penetrating rectal injuries, specifically with respect to the routine application of diversion and presacral drainage. Our previous experience suggested that management decisions based on precise anatomic characterization of injury relative to retroperitoneal involvement might improve outcome. A clinical pathway was developed and implemented. Patients managed by the pathway (PATH) were compared with the previous study (PREV, n=58) to determine the impact of the clinical pathway on outcome.
|
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:month |
Mar
|
|
pubmed:issn |
0022-5282
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
|
pubmed:volume |
60
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
508-13; discussion 513-14
|
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:16531847-Abscess,
pubmed-meshheading:16531847-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:16531847-Colonoscopy,
pubmed-meshheading:16531847-Critical Pathways,
pubmed-meshheading:16531847-Drainage,
pubmed-meshheading:16531847-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:16531847-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:16531847-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:16531847-Multiple Trauma,
pubmed-meshheading:16531847-Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care),
pubmed-meshheading:16531847-Rectum,
pubmed-meshheading:16531847-Retroperitoneal Space,
pubmed-meshheading:16531847-Surgical Wound Infection,
pubmed-meshheading:16531847-Wounds, Penetrating
|
|
pubmed:year |
2006
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Penetrating rectal trauma: management by anatomic distinction improves outcome.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38163, USA.
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|
