Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
9
pubmed:dateCreated
1991-9-26
pubmed:abstractText
A randomized study comparing teniposide (VM-26) and etoposide (VP-16) was performed to investigate whether there are any differences in the activity and toxicity of these two analogs in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Only previously untreated patients with SCLC were included; 46 and 48 patients receiving VP-16 and VM-26, respectively, are assessable for response. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to extent of disease, median age, and performance status (PS). The initial doses were for both compounds 70 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. After inclusion of 25 patients in the study, the doses were increased to 80 mg/m2 for VM-26 and 90 mg/m2 for VP-16 because of differences in toxicity. VM-26 caused more hematologic toxicity than VP-16 throughout the study. The overall responses (complete response [CR] plus partial response [PR]) were 65% for VP-16 and 71% for VM-26, with CR occurring in 24% and 23%, respectively, for the two compounds. Median survival was 8.5 months for VP-16-treated patients versus 11.3 months for VM-26-treated patients (P = .58). It is concluded that both VP-16 and VM-26 are highly active single agents in SCLC.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
0732-183X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
9
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1627-31
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1991
pubmed:articleTitle
Teniposide and etoposide in previously untreated small-cell lung cancer: a randomized study.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Oncology, Finsen Institute/Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Multicenter Study