Linked Life Data

16518302

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16518302

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
2006-3-6
pubmed:abstractText
The preoperative laboratory screening is commonplace in clinical practice and is traditionally defined as the practice of prescribing laboratory testing before surgery on patients undergoing a given procedure. The wide heterogeneity of the solutions prospected over the past decades emphasizes the objective difficulty at issuing definitive guidelines and recommendations. Despite its widespread use, a systematic evaluation of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of routine laboratory testing demonstrates that several approaches are as yet unsuitable, as inappropriate investigations may lead to evaluation of borderline or false-positive laboratory abnormalities. Three major difficulties can be identified when issuing reliable recommendations: articulation and appropriateness of diagnostic protocols, contestualization, in terms of surgical procedures and suitable clinical contests that might achieve the greatest advantages from results of laboratory testing, and impact of these tests on clinical management and outcome. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current literature on this topic, attempting to suggest a suitable approach to the puzzling issue of preoperative laboratory testing.
pubmed:language
ita
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
0026-4806
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
96
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
397-407
pubmed:dateRevised
2011-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2005
pubmed:articleTitle
[Preoperative laboratory testing].
pubmed:affiliation
Unità di Chimica e Microscopia Clinica, Dipartimento di Scienze Morfologico-Biomediche, Università degli Studi di Verona, Verona, Italy. ulippi@tin.it
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, English Abstract, Review