Linked Life Data

16480348

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16480348

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
2006-2-16
pubmed:abstractText
Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) allows patients to match their sedation requirement to perceived discomfort. The significant delay in onset of sedation may be overcome with effect-site steered target controlled infusion, but previously only trials in volunteers have been carried out. We therefore conducted a randomised, double-blind controlled trial comparing effect-site steered propofol PCS with anaesthetist-administered propofol sedation in 40 patients presenting for colonoscopy. The initial effect-site target in the PCS group was 0.8 microg.ml(-1), increment was 0.1 microg.ml(-1) and lockout was 3 min. Patient and endoscopist satisfaction and operating conditions were similar between the two groups. PCS patients were sedated more slowly (13 [7.1] vs. 3 [1.1] min; p < 0.0001) and less deeply (minimum BIS value: 71 [16] vs. 58 [15]; p = 0.13) than anaesthetist-administered propofol sedation patients. More of the latter patients were hypotensive, but all patients had similar recollection of events during the procedure and similar quality of recovery.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
0003-2409
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
61
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
240-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2006
pubmed:articleTitle
Effect-site targeted patient-controlled sedation with propofol: comparison with anaesthetist administration for colonoscopy.
pubmed:affiliation
Research Fellow, 2 Head of Research, Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial