rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0001861,
umls-concept:C0026336,
umls-concept:C0038111,
umls-concept:C0205245,
umls-concept:C0392762,
umls-concept:C0441635,
umls-concept:C0677615,
umls-concept:C0678594,
umls-concept:C0810473,
umls-concept:C1704922,
umls-concept:C1707455,
umls-concept:C2678061,
umls-concept:C2681903
|
pubmed:issue |
9
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2006-9-4
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Typical packages used for coregistration in functional image analyses include automated image registration (AIR) and statistical parametric mapping (SPM). However, both methods have limited-dimension deformation models. A fully deformable model, which combines the piecewise linear registration for coarse alignment with demons algorithm for voxel-level refinement, allows a higher degree of spatial deformation. This leads to a more accurate colocalization of the functional signal from different subjects and therefore can produce a more reliable group average signal. We quantitatively compared the performance of the three different registration approaches through a series of experiments and we found that the fully deformable model consistently produces a more accurate structural segmentation and a more reliable functional signal colocalization than does AIR or SPM.
|
pubmed:grant |
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16463385-10677559,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16463385-11403198,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16463385-12391568,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16463385-12956267,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16463385-15832060,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16463385-15990339,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16463385-8812068,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16463385-9448780,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16463385-9530404,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16463385-9563953,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16463385-9873902
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Sep
|
pubmed:issn |
1065-9471
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:copyrightInfo |
(c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
27
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
747-54
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2011-9-26
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:16463385-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:16463385-Algorithms,
pubmed-meshheading:16463385-Brain,
pubmed-meshheading:16463385-Brain Mapping,
pubmed-meshheading:16463385-Cervical Atlas,
pubmed-meshheading:16463385-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:16463385-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:16463385-Image Processing, Computer-Assisted,
pubmed-meshheading:16463385-Imaging, Three-Dimensional,
pubmed-meshheading:16463385-Magnetic Resonance Imaging,
pubmed-meshheading:16463385-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:16463385-Sensitivity and Specificity
|
pubmed:year |
2006
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Quantitative comparison of AIR, SPM, and the fully deformable model for atlas-based segmentation of functional and structural MR images.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't,
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
|