16449270

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/16449270

Download in:

Switch to

Custom View

Named Graph Language Inference

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
Predicate	Object
rdf:type	pubmed:Citation
lifeskim:mentions	umls-concept:C0008976, umls-concept:C0029921, umls-concept:C0199529, umls-concept:C0439230, umls-concept:C1442465, umls-concept:C2587213
pubmed:issue	9
pubmed:dateCreated	2006-8-28
pubmed:abstractText	The evidence of benefit for pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programmes is established. However, the optimal duration of a PR programme is not known. A randomised controlled trial was undertaken in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to assess whether a 4 week PR programme was equivalent to our conventional 7 week PR programme at equivalent time points of 7 weeks and 6 months.
pubmed:commentsCorrections	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16449270-10228143, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16449270-10325896, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16449270-10665556, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16449270-11207021, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16449270-11209104, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16449270-11713359, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16449270-12505859, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16449270-12775865, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16449270-1494764, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16449270-15778487, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16449270-7154893, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16449270-8892486, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/16449270-9584553
pubmed:language	eng
pubmed:journal	http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/journal/0417353
pubmed:citationSubset	IM
pubmed:status	MEDLINE
pubmed:month	Sep
pubmed:issn	0040-6376
pubmed:author	pubmed-author:CollierRR, pubmed-author:MorganM D LMD, pubmed-author:SewellLL, pubmed-author:SinghS JSJ, pubmed-author:WilliamsJ E AJE
pubmed:issnType	Print
pubmed:volume	61
pubmed:owner	NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete	Y
pubmed:pagination	767-71
pubmed:dateRevised	2009-11-18
pubmed:meshHeading	pubmed-meshheading:16449270-Aged, pubmed-meshheading:16449270-Ambulatory Care, pubmed-meshheading:16449270-Female, pubmed-meshheading:16449270-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:16449270-Male, pubmed-meshheading:16449270-Prognosis, pubmed-meshheading:16449270-Prospective Studies, pubmed-meshheading:16449270-Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, pubmed-meshheading:16449270-Time Factors
pubmed:year	2006
pubmed:articleTitle	How long should outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation be? A randomised controlled trial of 4 weeks versus 7 weeks.
pubmed:affiliation	Pulmonary Rehabilitation Research Group, Institute for Lung Health, Department of Respiratory Medicine and Thoracic Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK. louise.sewell@uhl-tr.nhs.uk
pubmed:publicationType	Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't